Deutsche Post World Net
20 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Berlin 1
31.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Interesting tasks. Recommendable workplace.
Bonn 2
12.09.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Fair payments. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Hamburg 3
29.03.2007
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Hannover 4
01.06.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 5
26.07.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 6
10.07.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 7
02.02.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 8
02.04.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 9
10.07.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 10
18.05.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Germany 11
14.07.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Good Management. Interesting tasks. High payments. Beneficial career. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 12
12.03.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Below-average salary. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Leer 13
12.03.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Fair payments. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Lüneburg 14
11.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Munich 15
01.06.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Average recognition. Recommendable workplace.
Oldenburg 16
03.04.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Good Management. Acceptable service. High payments. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Saarbrücken 17
17.12.2007
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Below-average salary. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Stuttgart 18
30.10.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Interesting tasks. High payments. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Stuttgart 19
25.03.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Problematic management style. Excellent activity. High payments. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Stuttgart 20
14.04.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Fair payments. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.